My position on the death penalty? Yes, for proven acts of terrorism, child killers, gang rape, cop killers and serial killers.
Are innocent folk sentenced to death? Yes, and this is a sad fact. But I'd support the death penalty for the categories above, only for those who have been sentenced with multiple evidence sources verified against them, which has brought a jury to the verdict of their undoubted guilt. The guilty should then receive whatever the state law has on it's books for the above crimes. In Utah, currently they have a dilemma in the death department. It's rather bad form that the injection elixir is in such short supply (it comes from the EU) but the limp-wrist liberals of Europe are withholding. Death makes them a ta squeamish, unless it's their own that is. So what other ways to depart the very guilty in the categories that I'd support? Bullets and a squad of keen lads has it's draw backs; each one not knowing if they had that blank. As for Islam's Koranics favorite, throat or head chop? Much too messy; and then there's the clean-up expenses to considered. Nope, there's little to beat the hemp neck-tie routine; quick drop from a good stout bough. Yeah it's old, but it sure is tried and tested; with the added advantage that Eurostan has bugger all say in the matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment